wait wait wait
the past few months and the violence associated with fraternities have in many ways rocked what used to be a solid belief in my part that up law was a safe haven from those who choose to wield padlocks and pipes and baseball bats while hiding behind masks.
it has sparked not a few rounds of witty and not so witty banter on the subject, which has for some people degenerated into a pissing contest.
i would like to say that the people who are talking the loudest about this are forgetting one crucial fact. the people who belong to fraternities, the people they are actually talking about right now, are human beings. some of them have dealt with or are at this moment being made to deal with consequences of the actions of their groups, or of their actions, consequences with a reach into the future far longer than the commentaries of people in their blogs and email lists ever will.
we all speak of fraternities and how fraternities perpetuate a culture of violence and almost criminal secrecy and how they should be abolished with a degree of intellectualism and detachment. and we reduce human beings to points of discussion.
what i do know of frats comes from going out with a member of one a couple of years back. (actually i had a streak going there for a while, but that is a topic for future discussion) those couple of years were a lesson in tolerance and acceptance, tolerance of the magnification of machismo that comes part and parcel when groups of young-and not so young men- come together, and acceptance of the fact that your life with your boyfriend is in a way dictated by his life in the fraternity. (there's nothing like a cancelled anniversary date-or any date for that matter- due to an emergency of whatever sort to better illustrate that. ) tolerance and acceptance-though in my part very limited- also came in the form of knowing the excesses that contribute towards this all popular opinion of fraternity people as violent little bastards who hide behind a wall of masked men to bully other people.
don't get me wrong, some of them really are violent little bastards. some of them are snivelling little weasels i'd love to whack upside the head. there are not a few things i take issue with fraternities about, such a code of silence that extends to a conspiracy among brods to aid their other brods in their efforts to cheat on their girlfriends. and there are those unbelievably moronic people who think being brothers means they can meddle all the goddamned time in every goddamned thing. the list goes on and on.
but there are exceptions to the popular opinion (that fraternity people are violent bastards and snivelling weasels), exceptions enough that they should be held to admit of an error in the formulation of such an all pervasive opinion.
there's a batchmate of mine, an evening student, who was attacked here in law, who missed work, missed school, missed a lot of things he enjoyed due to a rival frat's insane desire to prove that nowhere is anyone untouchable, and that numerical superiority can make mincemeat of the tiniest and most harmless of people. he's nice, he works in the day and studies in the evening, he plays volleyball with other friends, he's pleasant and generally a decent, harmless guy.
there's the guy who, when i was involved in an issue regarding another brod of his, went out of his way to show that brod that he was on my side, at risk of getting alienated. another brod of his- a really old friend- actually went and fought my battles for me, in consideration of-and yes he valued this more- a tie way deeper than the one he had with the frat.
there's the other guy who, in the years i had a streak going, has borne witness to that streak and the disasters they ended up becoming, who has given me advice and has been a friend and a confidant, even about matters regarding those brothers of his who were part of that unlucky streak.
right now, i have a friend, a mentor of sorts along with his devoted, who i hear is facing a major dilemma that will lay waste to his years of hard work, who probably-i believe- is not even supposed to be in this situation. he's a nice guy, a great big brother-father ba? malay, a great boyfriend to my mother hen, a person who goes out of his way to be polite and friendly. i haven't seen him since the news broke out, i haven't spoken with him, but i think his concerns are not unimportant, and he is the last person i would ever ever think of as hurtful or offensive.
on and on really the list goes, and there are many people i am friends with who you wouldn't believe are fratmen. simple unassuming men who do not allow their fraternities to define their humanity, but instead make sure their humanity transcends the everyday garden variety bullshit that their groups -not just frats, but concentrated groups of all kinds- can expose them to.
it's for them i speak.
you can all go and debate all you want and fall on you argumentum ad hominem and out and out non sequiturs and slippery slope swords all you want about the snivelling weasels and the violent little bastards.
i say go for them, and with gusto.
just try not to box everyone who belongs to frats in neat little catergories. let's remember that some of the country's greatest criminals come from, or are being aided and abetted in their efforts by those who come from the nice little fraternity-sorority that is the UP College of Law,
and i don't think any one of us here would take kindly to being called a criminal when we haven't even passed the bar yet.
peace, brothers.
well, i have no lovelife. hence, i have a useless comment on current events. sorry.
it has sparked not a few rounds of witty and not so witty banter on the subject, which has for some people degenerated into a pissing contest.
i would like to say that the people who are talking the loudest about this are forgetting one crucial fact. the people who belong to fraternities, the people they are actually talking about right now, are human beings. some of them have dealt with or are at this moment being made to deal with consequences of the actions of their groups, or of their actions, consequences with a reach into the future far longer than the commentaries of people in their blogs and email lists ever will.
we all speak of fraternities and how fraternities perpetuate a culture of violence and almost criminal secrecy and how they should be abolished with a degree of intellectualism and detachment. and we reduce human beings to points of discussion.
what i do know of frats comes from going out with a member of one a couple of years back. (actually i had a streak going there for a while, but that is a topic for future discussion) those couple of years were a lesson in tolerance and acceptance, tolerance of the magnification of machismo that comes part and parcel when groups of young-and not so young men- come together, and acceptance of the fact that your life with your boyfriend is in a way dictated by his life in the fraternity. (there's nothing like a cancelled anniversary date-or any date for that matter- due to an emergency of whatever sort to better illustrate that. ) tolerance and acceptance-though in my part very limited- also came in the form of knowing the excesses that contribute towards this all popular opinion of fraternity people as violent little bastards who hide behind a wall of masked men to bully other people.
don't get me wrong, some of them really are violent little bastards. some of them are snivelling little weasels i'd love to whack upside the head. there are not a few things i take issue with fraternities about, such a code of silence that extends to a conspiracy among brods to aid their other brods in their efforts to cheat on their girlfriends. and there are those unbelievably moronic people who think being brothers means they can meddle all the goddamned time in every goddamned thing. the list goes on and on.
but there are exceptions to the popular opinion (that fraternity people are violent bastards and snivelling weasels), exceptions enough that they should be held to admit of an error in the formulation of such an all pervasive opinion.
there's a batchmate of mine, an evening student, who was attacked here in law, who missed work, missed school, missed a lot of things he enjoyed due to a rival frat's insane desire to prove that nowhere is anyone untouchable, and that numerical superiority can make mincemeat of the tiniest and most harmless of people. he's nice, he works in the day and studies in the evening, he plays volleyball with other friends, he's pleasant and generally a decent, harmless guy.
there's the guy who, when i was involved in an issue regarding another brod of his, went out of his way to show that brod that he was on my side, at risk of getting alienated. another brod of his- a really old friend- actually went and fought my battles for me, in consideration of-and yes he valued this more- a tie way deeper than the one he had with the frat.
there's the other guy who, in the years i had a streak going, has borne witness to that streak and the disasters they ended up becoming, who has given me advice and has been a friend and a confidant, even about matters regarding those brothers of his who were part of that unlucky streak.
right now, i have a friend, a mentor of sorts along with his devoted, who i hear is facing a major dilemma that will lay waste to his years of hard work, who probably-i believe- is not even supposed to be in this situation. he's a nice guy, a great big brother-father ba? malay, a great boyfriend to my mother hen, a person who goes out of his way to be polite and friendly. i haven't seen him since the news broke out, i haven't spoken with him, but i think his concerns are not unimportant, and he is the last person i would ever ever think of as hurtful or offensive.
on and on really the list goes, and there are many people i am friends with who you wouldn't believe are fratmen. simple unassuming men who do not allow their fraternities to define their humanity, but instead make sure their humanity transcends the everyday garden variety bullshit that their groups -not just frats, but concentrated groups of all kinds- can expose them to.
it's for them i speak.
you can all go and debate all you want and fall on you argumentum ad hominem and out and out non sequiturs and slippery slope swords all you want about the snivelling weasels and the violent little bastards.
i say go for them, and with gusto.
just try not to box everyone who belongs to frats in neat little catergories. let's remember that some of the country's greatest criminals come from, or are being aided and abetted in their efforts by those who come from the nice little fraternity-sorority that is the UP College of Law,
and i don't think any one of us here would take kindly to being called a criminal when we haven't even passed the bar yet.
peace, brothers.
well, i have no lovelife. hence, i have a useless comment on current events. sorry.
